GUSA Roundup: The Senate is anti-hate crime, anti-snake

GUSA RoundupGUSA will not stand for these motherfucking snakes on this motherfucking plane campus

GUSA FUND: The big news from this week’s meeting was that the Senate passed the long-debated GUSA Fund, which will allow them to fund clubs directly. For more information, check out Vox‘s post from earlier this morning.

HATE CRIMES: GUSA passed a revised version of Senator Josh Mogil‘s (SFS ’11—Off Campus) changes to the Student Code of Conduct regarding hate crimes on a vote of 16 to two, with one abstention.

The new version of the resolution adds Hate-Crimes as a Category C violation, but keeps bias as a “parameter” for other violations that are not “criminal acts of hate,” but are motivated by the aggravating factor of bias.

Mogil said he decided to leave in the section on “bias-related incidents” after speaking with Vice President of Student Affairs Todd Olson about the resolution.

Senator Nick Troiano (COL ’11—Village A, A-D) still had doubts about the necessity of the resolution.

“There’s no practical difference between someone who’s adjudicated based on a criminal act that would otherwise fall under Category C violations and those that would now fall under the sub-category,” Troiano said.

“Again I doubt the efficacy of creating a sub-category that only judges people based on what their thoughts were at the time when they committed this crime,” Troiano continue. “Shouldn’t we be judging people based on the outcomes of the crime, what they inflicted instead of trying to get inside their head? … Or is it only people who were audibly saying stuff at the time they were committing the crime that we’re going to place in the sub-category?”

Mogil said that in his experience, someone had drawn a swastika on him freshman year based on his perceived religious affiliation, which he said, “Everyone would consider a hate crime.” But under the current Student Code of Conduct, he was not allowed to charge his attacker with a Category C violation because he had not physically been harmed.

Troiano also asked what would happen if someone was assaulted because of a political belief.

“If we’re granting special exceptions for certain people, what happens to the people who aren’t granted these special exceptions?” he asked. “If this isn’t exhaustive and it isn’t going to change practically how crimes are adjudicated, we shouldn’t go down this path.”

Mogil replied that the resolution is based on D.C. and Federal law, which does not cover political affiliation as a motive for a hate crime, but said he was willing to change the definition.

Senator Jon-Matthew Hopkins (COL ’13—Darnall) said part of the reason “hate crimes” were made a separate Category C violation was that Category C violations must go to the Judicial Hearing Board, whereas other incidents do not.

Speaker of the Senate Adam Talbot (COL ‘12, LXR) said he would support the resolution because it represents a starting point to open a debate with the Office of Student Code of Conduct.

RATS! PT. 3: Senator Arman Ismail‘s (COL ‘11—Reynolds) efforts to learn more about the eradication of the rats has finally culminated in a bill allocating $200 to initiate a public awareness campaign. The campaign will “promote effective trash and waste removal and storage practices” through fliers, door-to-door campaigning and tabling. Ismail called it the “next step in an ongoing process” to work with Facilities and educate students about the rodent issue on campus.

In a more lighthearted moment, Troiano sought assurance that the $200 will not be used to introduce snake species to prey on the rats, as some have suggested. Ismail assured the Senate he finds snakes the “most foul creature imaginable” and he would not use the money to buy animals of any kind.

TAKE YOUR PROFESSOR TO LUNCH: As part of an initiative to improve “intellectual life” on campus, the executive is hoping to launch a program called “Take Your Professor to Lunch,” where neighborhood restaurants such as Clyde’s, Saxby’s and Tombs would offer students a 20 to 30 percent discount if they go to lunch with their professors. According to GUSA Vice President Jason Kluger (MSB ’11), Saxby’s is already on board.

RATE MY LANDLORD/DORMITORY?: The executive has done more research into the idea of a “rate my landlord”-type website and found a Georgetown senior who already runs a “good website” on the subject. Instead of starting from scratch, the executive hopes to expand on the already existing site to include more direct student feedback about their experiences.

Senator Chetan Panda (COL ’13—New South) asked if the website might also include a section on “rate my dormitory.”

“The student housing website is a joke,” Panda said. “It has no pictures, no testimonies.”

Kluger liked the idea and said he would get Panda in contact with the senior who runs the website.

61-D CITATIONS AND 2010 CAMPUS PLAN: The executive says they have been having a lot of meetings about 61-D citations, neighbor relations and the new campus plan. About the 2010 Campus Plan, Kluger briefly mentioned, “It’s not the greatest situation.”

Additionally, the executive hopes to assemble a lawyer panel of Georgetown graduates to give students advice about what to do if they get a 61-D citations so students are not “in the dark” about the charges they face.

7 Comments on “GUSA Roundup: The Senate is anti-hate crime, anti-snake

  1.  by  Pabs

    Residence Hall, not Dormitory. Get it right or pay the price.

    In all seriousness though, I don’t find that to be too helpful. As a freshman, you do not have a choice of what residence hall to which you are allocated. I feel like this would just foster unnecessary negativity towards the upcoming school year if they are under the impression they are in the “bad” freshman hall.

    For sophomore year forward, you would have been on campus for a year, long enough to know what residences are like. Rooms are essentially identical, less Nevils, where floor plans can help out.

  2.  by  okay

    But that still doesn’t explain why there are no pictures and no room or floor plans on the housing site (aside from housing at a glance, which routinely makes the room/floor plans inaccessible during several weeks of the year). I agree that the need to have a “Rate my Residence Hall” is somewhat unnecessary, but at least having better descriptions of the rooms available year round is not too hard to ask.

  3.  by  charlie parker

    who voted against the hate crimes bill? is that open record?

  4. Pingback: Vox Populi » Administrators hold safety forum in response to hate crimes

  5.  by  J. Stuef

    Is this $200 campaign going to stop people from throwing away food and food wrappers? Half the time I see rats, they’re in the trash can, rummaging through. I don’t know whether to hand my garbage to the rat or hold onto it until I reach the next can. And hand it to the rat in that one.

  6. Pingback: Obama is Insane.. - Page 6 - TeakDoor.com - The Thailand Forum

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>