Annual crime report: Noise violations down, alcohol and drug violations up

Earlier this month, the Department of Public Safety released its Annual Crime Report. Buried in the 30 plus pages of security policy and procedure, which are required by the Clery Act, are numbers on campus crimes for the 2009 calendar year.

A variety of “Category A” violations, including those for noise, party hosting, disorderly conduct, and personal responsibility, decreased compared to the previous year. (Noise violations, for example, went down from 556 to 337.)

The decrease in party hosting violations is especially eye-catching; the number decreased from 147 to 26—a more than 80 percent drop—compared to 2008.

However, both alcohol and drug violations are on the rise compared to years past. In 2008, DPS reported 318 alcohol and 17 drug violations. Last year, those numbers rose to 334 and 49, respectively. The rise in alcohol violations ends a three-year decline.

Nonetheless, crime numbers on campus ain’t what they used to be. With exception to 2005, alcohol violations topped 700 per year from 2002 to 2006. The eight-year high, 903 violations, came in 2006, shortly before the University instituted its new alcohol policy.

4 Comments on “Annual crime report: Noise violations down, alcohol and drug violations up

  1. party hosting violations dropped because parties aren’t allowed at georgetown anymore. thanks anne koester!

  2. Drug violations? Did we send them to jail or kick their sorry assess out of school?

    What part of illegal don’t you understand? Thanks for helping to prop up the corrupt narco-economies that enslave the governments and citizens of the Third World. Don’t worry, you can shuffle back to Greenwich and make a donation to Doctors without Borders to alleviate your guilt.

  3. Hey Beltway,

    I’d be willing to bet that every one of those drug charges is related to Marijuana. Pot is grown domestically
    and even sold legally in some states, get over yourself. Take your self-righteous, Third World rants somewhere
    that actually condones what ever the hell it is you’re trying to say.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>